A child in Singapore undergoes at least 10 years of general education which comprises of at least 6 years of compulsory primary school education and 4 years of secondary school education today. The main motive for such a regulation by the Ministry of Education was to ensure that all Singaporeans are equip with basic fundamentals which will allow them to secure a job. When Singapore gain independence in 1965, there was a need for economic and social development on top of racial and religion harmony. MM Lee saw the need and subsequently made the call to make education compulsory and accessible for all children of schooling age. Over the years, Singapore gained the title of a 'World Class Education Hub' which undeniably contributed tremendously to our economy on top of all the right economic calls made by the
government.
Today's India is similar to
Singapore then, besides the fact that they have much more manpower and resources to tap into. While all eyes are cast at the world's second largest and uprising economy, there are many road blocks which can potentially cripple the country's dream.
With a population where 40% are under the age of 18, India faces the challenge to educate its young to fuel its economy. Nearly half of the poorest 20% of the population illiterate and barely 2% graduated from high school. However, out of the country's richest 20%, only 2% are illiterate and nearly half are high school graduates.
While the country is enjoying tremendous economic growth and development, the challenge here is to ensure even the poorest of the poor benefits from it. India faces the need to churn out skilled labours to fuel its economy, and the need to quench the population's growing thirst for education as more realise that the only way to jump on this economic bandwagon is through education. On top of all that, a rock solid system to ensure that
education is
accessible to all particularly those at the bottom.
Will India be able to break out of its legacy of weak schooling for its young? Never mind about those top notch world class public university which is not as significant an issue as providing proper basic education for the population, in particular for the poor. However hopeful, I'm still skeptical with regards to India's ability to break out of this legacy. First and foremost, forget all those money pumped in to build more schools and provide better schooling facilities. Without a strong, dedicated, passionate teachers and corrupt free officials, no matter how much money is being pumped in, nothing will come out of it. Take for example, while the government pledge an increase in country's spending in education, exactly how much have reached and
truly benefit at a ground level? Not much.
Bribes demanded by village heads, corrupted and zero-dedication teachers are not helping at all.
At the rate which the economy is progressing, will the nation be able to educate its people fast enough to fuel itself? What happens if India fails to educate its poor and help bring them onto the bandwagon in time? What happens if its efforts to provide enough skilled labours falls short? No doubt the country will continue to develop and progress, but closing the income and literacy gap will be a big hindrance. Without a need to spell it out explicitly, you would have guessed it, social instability w
ill kick in.
When the fundamentals of a nation to fuel its economy and develop itself is not strong, it's hard for sustainable economic progress to take place. Take Singapore as a good example where the fundamentals of providing the population with good basic education is met, strong economic progress will follow. All eyes are on the world's oldest
Democratic country, will they emerge as strong as we expect?
Education now is all about economic survival in the future. The nation has come to realise this, but will they be able to build a foundation strong enough for their
future generations to survive and rely upon? I wonder.